What is a Gettier counterexample?

Attributed to American philosopher Edmund Gettier, Gettier-type counterexamples (called “Gettier-cases”) challenge the long-held justified true belief (JTB) account of knowledge. Some reject Gettier’s examples, while others seek to adjust the JTB account of knowledge and blunt the force of these counterexamples.

What is the problem that all gettier cases have in common?

Rather, it is to find a failing — a reason for a lack of knowledge — that is common to all Gettier cases that have been, or could be, thought of (that is, all actual or possible cases relevantly like Gettier’s own ones).

What is the gettier problem quizlet?

Only $35.99/year. The Gettier Problem. Gettier is arguing that while Justification, Truth, and Belief may all be necessary for knowledge, they are not jointly sufficient.

What do Gettier cases show?

Gettier presented two cases in which a true belief is inferred from a justified false belief. He observed that, intuitively, such beliefs cannot be knowledge; it is merely lucky that they are true. In honour of his contribution to the literature, cases like these have come to be known as “Gettier cases”.

How do you solve a Gettier problem?

Gilbert Harman’s solution to the Gettier problem is that reasoning from a false belief precludes knowledge, but Gettier subjects do rea- son from false beliefs, and so do not know. 6 If we distinguish implicit assumptions from beliefs, then we might extend Harman’s proposal to cover false implicit assumptions too.

How do you solve a gettier problem?

Does Gettier think that Smith has enough evidence to believe that Jones will get the job and that Jones has ten coins in his pocket?

[e] The man who will get the job has ten coins in his pocket. Let’s suppose, says Gettier, that Smith sees the entailment from [d] to [e], and accepts [e] on the grounds of [d], for which he has strong evidence. In this case, Smith is clearly justified in believing that [e] is true.

What is Gettier’s aim in his article?

Some philosophers may claim that proposal (B) misses the point of Gettier’s original article. Gettier’s objective, after all, was to show that the justified true belief analysis of knowledge cannot be correct.

How do you solve a Gettier Problem?

What is the gettier problem essay?

The Gettier Problem is a widely acknowledged philosophical question, named in honour of Edmund Gettier who discovered it in 1963, which questions whether a piece of information that someone believes for invalid reasons, but by mere happenstance is correct, counts as knowledge.

What is the Gettier problem in philosophy?

The Gettier problem, in the field of epistemology, is a landmark philosophical problem concerning the understanding of descriptive knowledge. Attributed to American philosopher Edmund Gettier, Gettier-type counterexamples (called “Gettier-cases”) challenge the long-held justified true belief (JTB) account of knowledge.

What are Gettier-type counterexamples?

Attributed to American philosopher Edmund Gettier, Gettier-type counterexamples (called “Gettier-cases”) challenge the long-held justified true belief (JTB) account of knowledge.

What are Gettier’s examples?

The main idea behind Gettier’s examples is that the justification for the belief is flawed or incorrect, but the belief turns out to be true by sheer luck. Linda Zagzebski shows that any analysis of knowledge in terms of true belief and some other element of justification that is independent from truth, will be liable to Gettier cases.

What is a Gettier case?

In other words, Gettier cases can be generated for any analysis of knowledge that involves a justification criterion and a truth criterion, which are highly correlated but have some degree of independence.