What does John Polkinghorne say about science and religion?

What does John Polkinghorne say about science and religion?

Sir POLKINGHORNE: Both science and theology believe that there is a truth to be found about reality. They believe there is a truth to be sought and as far as possible to be found. Never, of course, totally to be found either in science or in theology.

Did Dawkins believe in God?

What does Richard Dawkins believe in? Richard Dawkins is a proponent of atheism, the critique and denial of metaphysical beliefs in God or spiritual beings. Much of Dawkins’s work has generated debate for asserting the supremacy of science over religion in explaining the world.

Does Richard Dawkins believe in evolution?

Richard Dawkins is a famous biologist and is also an atheist. He is a great supporter of the theory of evolution. For Dawkins, Darwin’s theory on natural selection solves the question of where humans come from. As he does not believe in God, Dawkins argues that evolution does not need help from a higher being.

Is Richard Dawkins a good scientist?

Originally Answered: Is Richard Dawkins a scientist? Yes. And a good one. Not only he has done basic research, but also proposed some novel and provocative ideas (e.g. extended phenotype), which is rare in academia.

Who is John Polkinghorne?

John Polkinghorne is a major figure in today’s debates over the compatibility of science and religion. Internationally known as both a theoretical physicist and a theologian—the only ordained member of the Royal Society—Polkinghorne brings unique qualifications to his inquiry into the possibilities of believing in God in an age of science.

What is Polkinghorne’s scientific realism?

Polkinghorne’s scientific realism is a direct corollary to his theological realism that seeks clarity of knowledge but understands the limitations of a finite mind exploring an infinite God.

What is polpolkinghorne’s theology?

Polkinghorne explores a new natural theology and emphasizes the importance of moral and aesthetic experience and the human intuition of value and hope. In other chapters, he compares science’s struggle to understand the nature of light with Christian theology’s struggle to understand the nature of Christ.

What is Polkinghorne’s path of consonance?

Polkinghorne concludes that the theologian must pursue the path of consonance which seeks to espouse a theology informed by science, but which reserves the right, along with the scientist, to “retain those categories which its experience has determined that it shall use, however counterintuitive they may be. [13] ”